Fakultet pedagoških nauka

FAKULTET PEDAGOŠKIH NAUKA UNIVERZITETA U KRAGUJEVCU, JAGODINA Milana Mijalkovića 14, 35000 Jagodina, Tel/Faks: +381 (0)35 8223-805, Tel: +381 (0)35 8222-262

BELIEFS OF STUDENT TEACHERS ABOUT THEIR COMPETENCIES FOR INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN SLOVENIA AND SERBIA


Download full text in PDF


Authors:

Sunčica V. Macura
Ivan Čuk
Mojca Peček

DOI: 10.46793/pctja.19.465M
UDK: 371.213.3:376.4

Abstract:

The inclusive education policy requires prospective teachers to develop competencies to promote learning in all pupils. Having in mind that teachers’ beliefs are reflected in their practice, the present study aims to explore beliefs of fourth-year student teachers from Slovenia and Serbia about their own competencies relating to inclusive education. Specifically, the research questions are: 1) What are student teachers’ beliefs about their own competencies related to inclusive education? 2) Are there any differences in student teachers’ beliefs in relation to the country in which they are studying? The sample consisted of 135 student teachers enrolled at the University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Education in Jagodina and the University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education in Ljubljana. The instrument (questionnaire) contained 26 statements relating to eight areas of teacher expertise: setting the ‘learning to learn’ goal for all pupils; taking responsibility for the learning of all pupils; personalized learning approaches that support autonomy in learning; identifying and addressing barriers to learning; differentiation of curriculum content, learning process and learning materials; positive classroom management; formative and summative assessment and cooperative learning. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 22.0. The frequencies of each of the responses were calculated for each group of students (Slovenia and Serbia). Differences between the two groups of students were analysed with the χ² test. The results of the study suggest that the majority of student teachers participating in the study feel competent in the abovementioned areas of teacher expertise. The self-confident perceptions of competencies of student teachers from both countries are interpreted in the lens of theories of professional development and implications for further development of teacher education for inclusive education are provided.

Keywords: student teachers, competencies, inclusive education, Slovenia, Serbia.

References:

Ainscow, M., Booth, T., Dyson, A., Farrell, P., Frankham, J., Gallannaugh, F., Howes, A. & Smith R. (2006). Improving schools, developing inclusion. London: Routledge.

Booth, T. & Ainscow, M. (2002). The index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol: CSIE.

Bullough, R. (1987). Planning and the first year of teaching. Journal of education for teaching, Vol. 11, No. 3, 231‒250. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747870130303

Kobolt, A., Ule, M., Dekleva, B., Peček Čuk, M., Rapuš Pavel, J., Razpotnik, Š. & Živoder, A. (2010). Slovenia. Goete work package II: Country Report. Governance of Educational Trajectories in Europe. Ljubljana: Faculty of Education and Faculty of Social Science.

Macura-Milovanović, S., Gera, I. & Kovačević, M. (2010). Nacionalni izveštaj za Srbiju. Torino: European Training Foundation.

European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education (EADSNE) (2011): Teacher Education for Inclusion Across Europe – Challenges and Opportunities. Odense, Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.

European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education (EADSNE) (2010). Teacher Education for Inclusion. International Literature Review. Odense, Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.

EADSNE (2012): Teacher Education for Inclusion. Profile of Inclusive Teachers. Odense, Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.

EASNIE (2015): Agency Position on Inclusive Education Systems. Retrieved from Odense, Denmark: https://www.european-agency.org/sites/default/files/PositionPaper-EN.pdf

De Boera, A., Pijl, S. J. & Minnaert, A. (2011). Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: a review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, Vol. 15, No. 3, 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903030089

Florian, L. (2008): Special or inclusive education: future trends. BritishJournal ofSpecial Education, Vol. 35, No. 4, 202‒208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2008.00402.x

Florian, L. & Rouse, M. (2009): The Inclusive Practice Project in Scotland: Teacher education for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 25, No. 4, 594–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.003

Javrh, P. & Kalin, J. (2011): Poklilcni razvoj učitelja ‒ predpogoj za kakovostno poučevanje in upoštevanje raznolikosti učencev. In K. Ermenc (Ed.), Udejanjanje načela individualizacije v vzgojno-izobraževalni praksi: ali smo na pravi poti?: zbornik mednarodnega posveta (pp. 17‒21). Ljubljana: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete.

Jovanović, O., Simić, N. & Rajović, V. (2013): Students at risk: perceptions of Serbian teachers and implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2013.858693.

Macura, A., Čuk, I. & Peček, M. (2019): Beliefs of student teachers in Serbia and Slovenia about supporting vulnerable pupils in learning and social participation. European Journal of Special Needs Education, in print. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1607660.

Ministry of Education, Science, and Sport (2000): Zakon o usmerjanju otrok s posebnimi potrebami [Placement of children with special needs act]. Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport.

Mlinar, K. & Peček, M. (2014): Praksa je eno, teorija drugo ‒ mar res?: stališča študentov o inkluziji [Practice is one thing, theory something else ‒ Is this true?: students’ views on inclusion.]. In T. Devjak (Ed.), Sodobni pedagoški izzivi v teoriji in praksi (pp. 19‒35). Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta.

NARS [National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia] (2009): Law on the fundamentals of the education system. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 72/2009.

O’Toole, C. & Burke, N. (2013): Ready, willing and able? Attitudes and concerns in relation to inclusion amongst a cohort of Irish pre-service teachers. European Journal of Special Needs Education, Vol. 28, No. 3, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2013.768451

Pantić, N., Closs, A. & Ivošević, V. (2010): Teachers for the future ‒ Teacher development for inclusive education in the Western Balkans. Turin: European Training Foundation.

Pantić, N. (2008): Tuning Teacher Education Curricula in the Western Balkans. Belgrade: Centre for Education Policy.

Peček, M., & Lesar, I. (2011): Governance of educational trajectories in Europe: teacher education Slovenia: GOETE work package III: country report. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education; [Frankfurt am Mein]: GOETE, Governance of Educational Trajectories in Europe.

Peček, M. & Macura-Milovanović, S. (2012): Who is responsible for vulnerable pupils? The attitudes of teacher candidates in Serbia and Slovenia. European Journal of Teacher Education: Journal of the Association for Teacher Education in Europe, Vol. 35, No. 3, 327‒346. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2012.686105.

Peček, M., Macura-Milovanović, S. & Čuk, I. (2015): Regular versus special streams within teacher education. Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje, Vol. 17, No. 2, 99‒115 https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v17i0.1509.

Razdevšek-Pučko, C. (1990): Spremembe v stališčih in značilnosti posameznih obdobij v poklicnem razvoju učiteljev. In M. Velikonja (Ed.), Učitelj, vzgojitelj ‒ družbena in strokovna perspektiva: zbornik gradiv s posveta, Bled, 27. in 28. september 1990, 146‒151. Ljubljana: Zveza društev pedagoških delavcev Slovenije.