EXAMINING THE DIGITAL COMPETENCIES OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS
Author:
Verica R. Milutinović
DOI: 10.46793/pctja.19.373M
UDK: 371.124:004
Abstract:
This study aims to examine the variables that may influence pre-service teachers’ digital competencies at the Faculty of Education in Jagodina. If pre-service teachers are expected to integrate information and communication technology (ICT) into future teaching processes, they need to possess a high level of adequate competencies. In this study, digital competencies were identified as: (a) competencies to support pupils for ICT use in the class and (b) competencies to use ICT for instructional design. Four variables (support from teacher training institution (TTI), perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and attitudes towards ICT use) were hypothesized to have direct and positive influences on digital competencies. This study also investigated whether support from TTI, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and digital competencies had any effect on the pre-service teachers’ intention to use technology in their future teaching practice. Moreover, the development of pre-service teachers’ digital competencies while studying at the Faculty (i.e differences between freshmen, juniors and master students) were examined. With data gathered from 131 participants, using a survey questionnaire, linear regression analysis revealed positive effects of the strategies, perceived usefulness, attitudes, and perceived ease of use on pre-service teachers’ digital competencies. Furthermore, the results revealed a positive impact of pre-service teachers’ perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and digital competencies in their intention to use digital technology in future teaching. On the other hand, the strategies do not affect intention to use ICT. Various contributions to research and implications for teacher training are discussed.
Keywords: digital competencies, intention to use technology, linear regression, pre-service teachers, teacher training.
References:
Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping digital competence: Towards a conceptual understanding. Sevilla, Spain: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
Almerich, G., Orellana, N., Suárez-Rodríguez, J. & Díaz-García, I. (2016). Teachers’ information and communication technology competences: A structural approach. Computers & Education, 100, 110‒125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.002
Angeli, C. & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154‒168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
Bordbar, F. (2010). English teachers’ attitudes toward computer-assisted language learning. International Journal of Language Studies, 4(3), 27‒54.
Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 8(1), 136‒155.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Davies, S. & Pittard, V. (2008). Harnessing technology review 2008. The role of technology and its impact on education. Summary Report. https://doi.org/10.12968/sece.2008.11.1364
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
De Vellis, R. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Digital Competence Framework – Teacher for a Digital Age (2017). Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development. Retrieved from http://www.mpn.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Okvir-digitalnih-kompetencija-Final-1.pdf
Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. In Y. Punie, B. N. Brecˇko (Eds.), DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2788/52966
Ferrari, A. (2012), Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, European Commission Joint Research-Centre.
Franklin, C. (2007). Factors that influence elementary teachers use of computers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, Vol. 15, No. 2, 267–293.
Hoy, A. W. & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and teacher education, 21(4), 343‒356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007
International Society for Technology in Education (2008). NETS for teachers: National educational technology standards for teachers (2nd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-T_PDF.pdf.
Janssen, J., Stoyanov, S., Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., Pannekeet, K. & Sloep, P. (2013). Experts’ views on digital competence: Commonalities and differences. Computers & Education, 68, 473‒481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.008
Jegede, P. O., Dibu-Ojerinde, O. O. & Ilori, M. O. (2007). Relationships between ICTcompetence and attitude among some Nigerian tertiary institution lecturers. Educational Research and Reviews, 2(7), 172‒175.
Kline, R. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed.New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Kreijns, K., Van Acker, F., Vermeulen, M. & Van Buuren, H. (2013). What stimulatesteachers to integrate ICT in their pedagogical practices? The use of digital learning materials in education. Computers in human behavior, 29(1), 217‒225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.08.008
Kreijns, K., Vermeulen, M., Kirschner, P. A., Buuren, H. V. & Acker, F. V. (2013). Adopting the Integrative Model of Behaviour Prediction to explain teachers’ willingness to use ICT: a perspective for research on teachers’ ICT usage in pedagogical practices. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(1), 55‒71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2012.754371
Krumsvik, R. J. (2011). Digital competence in the Norwegian teacher educationand schools. Högre utbildning, 1(1), 39‒51.
Maderick, J. A., Zhang, S., Hartley, K. & Marchand, G. (2016). Preservice teachersand self-assessing digital competence. Journal of Educational Computing Research,54(3), 326‒351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115620432
Milutinović, V. (2016a). Modeling the Acceptance of the Computer Use in Teaching. In J. Teodorović (Ed.), Proceedings of International scientific conference Improvingquality of education in elementary schools (pp. 249‒264). Belgrade: Institute for Educational Research, Institute for Improvement of Education; Jagodina: Faculty of Education, University of Kragujevac, Jagodina.
Milutinović, V. (2016b). Faktori koji utiču na nameru budućih učitelјa da koriste računar u nastavi. Uzdanica, XIII(2), 97‒115.
Newman, T. (2008). A review of digital literacy in 0–16 year olds: evidence, developmental models, and recommendations. London: Becta.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of educational research, 62(3), 307‒332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Peralta, H. & Costa, F. A. (2007). Teachers’s competence and confidence regarding the use of ICT. Sísifo-Educational Sciences Journal, 75‒84.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1‒6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Røkenes, F. M. & Krumsvik, R. J. (2014). Development of student teachers’ digitalcompetence in teacher education-A literature review. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(04), 250‒280.
Røkenes, F. M. & Krumsvik, R. J. (2016). Prepared to teach ESL with ICT? A study of digital competence in Norwegian teacher education. Computers & Education, 97, 1‒20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.014
Sandholtz, J. H. & Reilly, B. (2004). Teachers, not technicians: Rethinking technical expectations for teachers. Teachers College Record, 106(3), 487‒512.
Sang, G., Valcke, M., Tondeur, J., Zhu, C. & Van Braak, J. (2012). Exploring the educational beliefs of primary education student teachers in the Chinese context. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(3), 417‒425.
Stevens, J. P. (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Routledge.
Teo, T. (2009a). Evaluating the intention to use technology among student teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 5(2), 106‒118.
Teo, T. (2009b). Modeling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52, 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
Teo, T. & Milutinović, V. (2015). Modelling the intention to use technology for teaching Mathematics among pre-service teachers in Serbia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 31, No. 4, 363–380.
Teo, T., Milutinović V. & Zhou, M. (2016). Modelling Serbian pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: A SEM and MIMIC approach. Computers & Education, Vol. 94, 77‒88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.022
Teo, T., Milutinović, V., Zhou, M. & Banković, D. (2017). Traditional vs. innovative uses of computers among mathematics pre-service teachers in Serbia. Interactive-Learning Environments, 25(7), 811‒827. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1189943
Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S. & Consuegra, E. (2018). A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher’s ICT competencies. Computers & Education, 122, 32‒42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002
Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Pynoo, B., van Braak, J., Fraeyman, N. & Erstad, O. (2017). Developing a validated instrument to measure preservice teachers’ ICT competencies: Meeting the demands of the 21st century. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 462‒472. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12380
Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., Scherer, R. & Van Braak, J. (2016). Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use: Its meaning and measurement. Computers & Education, 94, 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.009
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J. & Valcke, M. (2007). Towards a typology of computer use in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00205.x
UNESCO (2011). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214694.pdf.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance ofinformation technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425‒478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wastiau, P., Blamire, R., Kearney, C., Quittre, V., Van de Gaer, E. & Monseur, C. (2013). The use of ICT in education: a survey of schools in Europe. European Journal of Education, 48, 11‒27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12020
Wong, G. K. W. (2015). Understanding technology acceptance in pre-service teachers of primary mathematics in Hong Kong. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6), 713–735. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1890
Woodcock, S. (2011). A cross sectional study of pre-service teacher efficacy throughout the training years. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(10), 23‒34. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n10.1
Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V. & Abrami, P.C. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and teacher education, Vol. 14, No.1, 173‒207.